A jewel case for a compact disc is made from polycarbonate ($2.20 per lb) by a thermoplastic molding process. Each CD case uses 20 grams of plastic. The parts will be made in a 10-cavity mold that makes 1400 parts per hour at an operating cost of $20 per hour. Manufacturing ovehead is 40%. Since the parts ae sold in large lots, the G&A expenses are a low 15%. Profit is 10%. What is the estimated selling price for each CD case?
Solutions:
jewel case = 20 gram ($ 2.20/lb)
OH = 40%
G&A = 15%
Profit = 10%
1 lb = 454 gram
1 gram = 2.2x10^-3 lb
10(2.2x10^-3) = $ 0.097/unit
$20/1400 = $ 0.014 per unit
Total cost = 0.097 + 0.014 = $ 0.111
Cost/hour = $0.111 x 1400 = $155.40
0.4 x 155.4 = $ 62.16
0.15 x 155.4 = $ 23.31
Total = 155.4 + 62.16 + 23.31 = $ 240.87
Profit = 1.1 x 240.87 = $ 264.96
Estimated selling price/unit = $ 264.96/1400 = $ 0.19/unit
▼
20131222
20131221
Assignment 17.4: Manufacturing Cost and Selling Price
Assignment
17.4 Manufacturing Cost and Selling Price for a Turbine
A manufacturer of a small hydraulic turbine has the annual cost data
given. Calculate the manufacturing cost and the selling price for the turbine.
Raw material and components costs $2,150,000
Direct labor $950,000
Direct expenses $60,000
Plant manager and staff $180,000
Utilities for plant $70,000
Taxes and insurance $50,000
Plant and equipment depreciation $120,000
Warehouse Expenses $60,000
Office Utilities $10,000
Engineering expenses (plant) $90,000
Engineering staff and salaries (plant) $30,000
Administrative staff salaries $120,000
Sales staff, salaries and commissions $100,000
Total Annual Sales 60
units
Profit Margin 15%
Variable costs
Raw material and components costs $2,150,000
Direct labor $950,000
Direct expenses $60,000
Engineering expenses (plant) $90,000
Engineering staff and salaries (plant) $30,000
Total Variable Costs $3,280,000
Factory Expenses
Utilities for plant $70,000
Taxes and insurance $50,000
Plant and equipment depreciation $120,000
Warehouse Expenses $60,000
Total Factory Expenses $300,000
General and Administrative
Expenses (G & A)
Plant manager and staff $180,000
Office Utilities $10,000
Administrative staff salaries $120,000
Total G & A $310,000
Manufacturing Cost = Variable costs + Factory Expenses + General and
Administrative Expenses
= $3,280,000
+ $300,000
+ $310,000
= $3,890,000
Sales, staff, salaries
and commissions $100,000
Total Cost =
Manufacturing costs + Sales, staff, salaries and commissions
= $3,990,000
Profit Margin = Profit / Sales = 15%
Profit (P) = Selling Price (S) – Total Cost (CT)
S = P + CT
S = 0.15S + CT
S – 0.15S = CT
0.85S = CT
S = CT /
0.85
S = $3,990,000 / 0.85
S = $4,694,117.65
Total Annual Sales = 60
units
Selling Price for One Turbine
= S / 60
= $4,694,117.65 / 60
Selling Price
= $78,235.29 per unit
20131220
Assignment 17.1
Solution:
Adjustment for the cost of the different size or capacity of the cyclone dust collector need to be purchased can not be calculated directly. Note that while the new units has 10 times the capacity as the unit purchased in 1985 will cost 10X more, because of economy of scale. However, the purchase cost will have increased because of inflation in the 27 years since it was purchased in 1985. Assuming cost inflation or 5 % per year, the original cost of $35,000 is now equivalent to
new cost for the 100 ft^3/min = [$35,000 x 5%] + $35,000 = $36,750
if 100 ft^3/min = X
1000 ft^3/min = 10X
Thus, the estimate of the cost to purchase 1000 ft^3/min in 2012 = 10X = $367,500
20131218
Assignment 11.3: Materials Selection
Which material property would be selected as guide in material selection if the chief performance characteristics of the component was:
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
|
MATERIAL PROPERTY
|
Strength
in Bending
|
Tensile
Strength
|
Resistance
to Twisting
|
Hardness
|
The
Ability of a Sheet Material to be Stretched into a Complex Curvature
|
Ductility
|
Ability
to Resist Fracture from Cracks at Low Temperatures
|
Malleability
|
Ability
to Resist Shattering if Dropped On the Floor
|
Toughness
|
Ability
to Resist Alternating Cycles of Rapid Heating and Cooling
|
Thermal
Shock Resistance
|
20131217
20131216
Assignment Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure
Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure mode and effects
analysis (FMEA) is a team – based methodology for identifying potential
problems with the new or existing designs. It is the first step of a system
reliability study. FMEA is the core task in reliability engineering, safety
engineering, and quality engineering. FMEA involves reviewing as many
components, assemblies, and subsystem as possible to identify failure modes,
and their causes and effects. In order to determine the components of the
process that are most in need of change, FMEA includes the following steps:
1. Steps in the
process.
2. Failure modes (What
could go wrong?)
3. Failure causes
(Why would the failure happen?)
4. Failure effects
(What would be the consequences of each failure?)
Three factors that are
considered in developing a FMEA:
1. The severity of
the failure.
2. The probability
of occurrence of failure.
3. The likelihood
of detecting the failure in either design or manufacturing, before the product
is used by the customer.
Different types of FMEA
analysis:
1. Functional,
2. Design, and
3. Process FMEA.
Major benefits derived
from a properly implemented FMEA are as follows:
1. It provides
documentation in selecting design with high probability of successful operation
and safety.
2. A uniform
documentation method of assessing potential failure mechanism, failure modes
and their impact on system operation, resulting in a list of failure modes
ranked according to seriousness of their system impact and likelihood of
occurrence.
3. Early identification
of single failure points (SFPS) and system interface problems which may be
critical to mission success and/or safety.
4. An effective
method for evaluating the effect of proposed changes t the design and/or
operational procedures on mission success and safety.
5. A basis for in –
flight troubleshooting procedures and for locating performance monitoring and
fault – detection devices.
6. Criteria for
early planning of tests.
Example of FMEA analysis for
car tire:
Keywords:
SEV – severity
OCC – occurrence
DET – Detection
RPN – Risk Priority Number
Function or Process
Step
|
Failure Type
|
Potential Impact
|
SEV
|
Potential Causes
|
OCC
|
Detection Mode
|
DET
|
RPN
|
Briefly outline
function, step or item being analyzed
|
Describe what has
gone wrong
|
What is the impact on
the key output variables or internal requirements?
|
How severe is the
effect to the customer?
|
What causes the key
input to go wrong?
|
How frequently is
this likely to occur?
|
What are the existing
controls that either prevent the failure from occurring or detect it should
it occur?
|
How easy is it to
detect?
|
Risk priority number
|
Tire function:
support weight of car, traction, comfort
|
Flat tire
|
Stops car journey,
driver and passengers stranded
|
10
|
Puncture
|
2
|
Tire checks before
journey. While driving, steering pulls to one side, excess noise
|
3
|
60
|
Recommended Actions
|
Responsibility
|
Target Date
|
Action Taken
|
SEV
|
OCC
|
DET
|
RPN
|
What are the actions
for reducing the occurrence of the cause or improving the detection?
|
Who is responsible
for the recommended action?
|
What is the target
date for the recommended action?
|
What were the actions
implemented? Now recalculate the RPN to see if the action has reduced the
risk.
|
||||
Carry spare tire and
appropriate tools to change tire
|
Car owner
|
From immediate effect
|
Spare tire and
appropriate tools permanently carried in trunk
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
24
|
Criteria for FMEA Analysis
FMEA is analyzed based
on three criteria:
1. Severity effect
on customer.
2. Occurrence of
failure.
3. Easy to detect.
It is then ranked from
1 (low) to 10 (high) for each criterion.
Table 1: Severity, Occurrence and Detection Ratings
Description
|
Low Number
|
High Number
|
|
Severity
|
Severity ranking encompasses what is important to the industry,
company or customers (e.g., safety standards, environment, legal, production
continuity, scrap, loss of business, damaged reputation)
|
Low impact
|
High impact
|
Occurrence
|
Rank the probability of a failure occuring during the expected
lifetime of the product or service
|
Not likely to occur
|
Inevitable
|
Detection
|
Rank the probability of the problem being detected and acted
upon before it has happened
|
Very likely to be detected
|
Not likely to be detected
|
Formula for RPN is:
RPN = severity x occurrence x detection
Setting Priorities
After failure has been
identified, the FMEA list of failure is adjusted in descending RPN order. This can
ensure that the corrective action can be focused.
Making Corrective Action
Once the priorities have
been agreed, it’s time to generate appropriate corrective actions for reducing
the occurrence of the failure modes. When the corrective actions have been
done, it is better to rescore and reassess the severity, probability of
occurrence and likelihood of detection for the top failure modes. This enables
to determine the effectiveness of the corrective action taken.
20131215
Assignment 8.3: New fingernail clipper
Normal or conventional fingernail clipper is consisting with the supporting shaft, upper and lower steel plate, and pressurizing bar. However, for some modification the design had been improvised for more aesthetic value. Casing and magnifying glass had been the additional parts into the new design of fingernail clipper. The casing is purposely to protect the nail cutting edge from tearing of thorn the clothes especially when keep it into the bag. The magnifying glass is to help for elderly especially to cut their nail and toe nail which is a bit far.












